El lugar del equipo de salud familiar en una comunidad educativa del barrio Jose I. Diaz: Algunas aproximaciones diagnósticas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Por su inserción comunitaria los equipos de salud familiar(ESF) ocupan un lugar clave para trabajar conjuntamente con las escuelas en la promoción de la salud y prevención de la enfermedad. El objetivo general de este trabajo es conocer el lugar del equipo de salud familiar en una comunidad educativa de barrio José Ignacio Días de la ciudad de Córdoba. Lametodología consistió en un diagnostico institucional para la construcción de hipótesis diagnostica. Se utilizaron técnicas formales e informales y por saturación. Las principales conclusiones dan cuenta de la tarea de los equipos de salud familiar (ESF) es fortalecer a las instituciones, pero como paso previo es necesario que la comunidad reconozca alos profesionales que desarrollan tares de promoción, prevención y asistencia comunitaria. Nuestra tarea será el de aportar elementos para que la propia institución se transforme en el verdadero referente del barrio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".