MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169274950 · doi:10.5539/mas.v5n5p10

Improvement of Torque-and-Drag Modeling in Long-Reach Wells

2011· article· en· W2169274950 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
S. A. Mirhaj, Eirik Kaarstad, Bernt S. Aadnøy

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsDragTorqueTrippingBuoyancyPiston (optics)DrillingMarine engineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringMechanicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Torque and drag modeling is regarded as an invaluable process to assist in well planning and to predict and prevent drilling problems. It discusses how to use torque and drag calculations and measurements to plan long-reach well profiles, to execute drilling operations that minimize torque and drag effects and to monitor hole cleaning. In this study a general overview on most of the available literature on the subject is presented. Different models that have been developed for torque and drag predictions along with pros and cons of the models will be discussed. The application of our new fully 3-dimensional analytical friction model will be presented. Moreover a new criterion has been implemented into the new model in order to capture the effect of weight in the horizontal section especially when BHA is dragged into/out of the wellbore. The model validity will be checked by applying the model for two field cases of ERD wells in North Sea. Field cases also demonstrate the importance of buoyancy effects, tripping speed, hydraulic piston force, pipe stiffness as well as well path effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207