Bibliographic record
Abstract
El iglu1 de nieve (o igluvigak2) constituyo la manifestacion mas representativa y conocida de la arquitectura vernacula de los inuit; pero ni era la unica, ni ellos fueron sus inventores. Este «lugar antropologico» contuvo y reforzo la identidad cultural de un pueblo que desarrollo un enorme ingenio para adaptarse a unas condiciones extremas. Si el igluvigak representaba una vida seminomada, las casas prefabricadas que empezaron a ser usuales en la decada de 1950 se convirtieron en un reflejo inequivoco del sedentarismo y consecuentemente de una perdida de identidad cultural. Los inuit entraron definitivamente en la Era Moderna y sus viviendas dejaron de ser lugares identificatorios, relacionales e historicos y se convirtieron en espacios frios y ausentes de personalidad: la vida en comunidad dio paso al individualismo urbano. No obstante, en las ultimas decadas, los inuit han intentado reconstruir un espacio acorde con sus nuevas necesidades, pero tambien identificativo con cierta recuperacion de sus valores mas tradicionales: sin duda, las casas prefabricadas inuit representan el pasado, presente y futuro de este pueblo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".