MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169280330 · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt163

Comparative transgenic analysis of enhancers from the human SHOX and mouse Shox2 genomic regions

2013· article· en· W2169280330 on OpenAlexafffund
Jessica M. Rosin, Samuel Abassah‐Oppong, John Cobb

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Molecular Genetics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEnhancerBiologyConserved sequenceTransgeneGeneGeneticsRegulatory sequenceEnhancer RNAsGenomeGenetically modified mouseRegulation of gene expressionGene expressionPeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disruption of presumptive enhancers downstream of the human SHOX gene (hSHOX) is a frequent cause of the zeugopodal limb defects characteristic of Léri-Weill dyschondrosteosis (LWD). The closely related mouse Shox2 gene (mShox2) is also required for limb development, but in the more proximal stylopodium. In this study, we used transgenic mice in a comparative approach to characterize enhancer sequences in the hSHOX and mShox2 genomic regions. Among conserved noncoding elements (CNEs) that function as enhancers in vertebrate genomes, those that are maintained near paralogous genes are of particular interest given their ancient origins. Therefore, we first analyzed the regulatory potential of a genomic region containing one such duplicated CNE (dCNE) downstream of mShox2 and hSHOX. We identified a strong limb enhancer directly adjacent to the mShox2 dCNE that recapitulates the expression pattern of the endogenous gene. Interestingly, this enhancer requires sequences only conserved in the mammalian lineage in order to drive strong limb expression, whereas the more deeply conserved sequences of the dCNE function as a neural enhancer. Similarly, we found that a conserved element downstream of hSHOX (CNE9) also functions as a neural enhancer in transgenic mice. However, when the CNE9 transgenic construct was enlarged to include adjacent, non-conserved sequences frequently deleted in LWD patients, the transgene drove expression in the zeugopodium of the limbs. Therefore, both hSHOX and mShox2 limb enhancers are coupled to distinct neural enhancers. This is the first report demonstrating the activity of cis-regulatory elements from the hSHOX and mShox2 genomic regions in mammalian embryos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Molecular GeneticsSame topicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207