MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169299257 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.42.6.1651

PREDICTION OF CRYSTAL MORPHOLOGY OF COMPLEX URANYL-SHEET MINERALS. II. OBSERVATIONS

2004· article· en· W2169299257 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Schindler, A. Mutter, F. C. Hawthorne, Andrew Putnis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUranylMorphology (biology)GeologyMineralogyGeochemistryCrystal (programming language)CrystallographyMaterials scienceChemistryUraniumMetallurgyPaleontologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphology of basal faces of uranyl-sheet minerals is predicted by considering the bond-valence deficiency of the chains of polyhedra, the shift between the layers, and the arrangement of the interstitial complexes between the layers. The sheet structural units of schoepite, [(UO2)8O2(OH)12](H2O)12, and fourmarierite, Pb[(UO2)4O3(OH)4](H2O)4, have the same underlying anion-topology. The stabilities of their edges differ because adjacent layers in schoepite are shifted by one chain of polyhedra, whereas adjacent layers are not shifted in fourmarierite. The minerals becquerelite, [7] Ca(H2O)4[(UO2)3O2(OH)3]2 (H2O)4, compreignacite, [7] K2(H2O)3 [(UO2)3O2(OH)3]2(H2O)4, billietite, [10] Ba(H2O)4[(UO2)3O2(OH)3]2 (H2O)3, protasite, [10] Ba(H2O)3[(UO2)3O3(OH)2], and masuyite, [10] Pb(H2O)3[(UO2)3O3(OH)2], all have structural units with the same basic aniontopology. The stabilities of their edges differ because of the different arrangements of interstitial species. In becquerelite, the interstitial cations are arranged in rows parallel to [010], whereas in billietite and compreignacite, the interstitial cations are arranged in rows parallel to [100]. For masuyite and protasite, the stability of their edges is defined by large differences in the bond-valence deficiencies of the chains of polyhedra with left and right terminations. The stabilities of edges in curite, Pb3[(UO2)8O8(OH)6](H2O)3, are dictated by the low bond-valence deficiencies of the chains of polyhedra parallel to [001] and [011], and by the arrangement of cations in rows parallel to [001]. Minerals of the carnotite group contain the structural unit [(UO2)2(V2O8)] 2‐ , and the stability of the edges of their sheets is determined by the low bond-valence deficiency of chains of polyhedra parallel to [010 and [110]. Minerals of the uranophane group are based on the [(UO2)SiO3(OH)] ‐ sheet, and the stabilities of their edges are more strongly affected by the bond-valence deficiency of the chains of polyhedra than by the arrangement of the interstitial cations, and by the shift in the sheets. All predictions are compared with the corresponding morphologies of crystals recorded by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), on images of crystals, and on crystal drawings from the (mainly older) mineralogical literature. All predictions are in good agreement with the observed morphology of the basal faces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207