MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169320428 · doi:10.1353/ajm.2003.0022

p -adic variation of L functions of one variable exponential sums, I

2003· article· en· W2169320428 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Mathematics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
Topicadvanced mathematical theories
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of California BerkeleyDavid and Lucile Packard Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsVariation (astronomy)Exponential functionVariable (mathematics)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a polynomial f ( x ) in ([inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="01i" /]) of degree d ≥ 3 let [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="02i" /] be the L function of the exponential sum of f mod p . Let NP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="03i" /] denote the Newton polygon of [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="04i" /]. Let HP ([inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="05i" /]) denote the Hodge polygon of [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="06i" /], which is the lower convex hull in [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="07i" /] of the points ( n, n ( n +1)/2 d ) for 0 ≤ n ≤ d - 1. Let [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="08i" /] be the space of degree- d monic polynomials parameterized by their coefficients. Let GNP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="09i" /] := [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="10i" /] NP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="11i" /] be the lowest Newton polygon over [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="12i" /] if exists. We prove that for p large enough GNP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="13i" /] exists and we give an explicit formula for it. We also prove that there is a Zariski dense open subset [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="14i" /] defined over [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="15i" /] in [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="16i" /] such that for [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="17i" /] and for p large enough we have NP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="18i" /] = GNP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="19i" /]; furthermore, as p goes to infinity their limit exists and is equal to HP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="20i" /]. Finally we prove analogous results for the space of polynomials f ( x ) = x d + ax with one parameter. In particular, for any nonzero a ∈ [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="21i" /] we show that lim p →∞ NP (( x d + ax ) ⊗ [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="22i" /]) = HP [inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="23i" /].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it