Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude des Nations unies (2000) intitulée « Replacement migrations : Is it a solution to declining and aging population ? » montre que l’immigration à elle seule ne saurait être une solution viable au vieillissement démographique. La situation démographique canadienne diffère de celles des pays analysés dans le rapport des Nations unies, notamment par son taux d’immigration parmi les plus élevés au monde. Contrairement aux idées reçues, les taux actuels d’immigration sont amplement suffisants pour assurer le maintien de la population canadienne et même de sa population en âge de travailler à des niveaux supérieurs à ceux observés actuellement à court, moyen et même long terme. Par contre, compte tenu de la concentration spatiale des immigrants à leur arrivée, une analyse des conséquences démographiques de l’immigration de remplacement au niveau provincial montre qu’une répartition plus égale des immigrants sur le territoire pourrait s’avérer plus efficace qu’une simple hausse des niveaux d’immigration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".