Superior Therapeutic Potential of Young Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Direct Intramyocardial Delivery in Aged Recipients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: In Vitro and In Vivo Investigation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been studied for treatment of myocardial infarction (MI). Since MSCs from older donors show quantitative and qualitative senescent changes, we hypothesized that a better outcome may be achieved if aged recipients are given MSCs obtained from young donors, rather than using their own autologous MSCs. Methods. In vitro studies compared properties of young and old MSCs. Aged rats randomized into 3 groups underwent coronary artery ligations and were then injected with either old (O) or young (Y) MSCs, or ligation alone. Echocardiography evaluated ejection fractions (EF). At 16 weeks, scar deposition was analyzed. Results. Old MSCs exhibited decreased cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation potentials. EF significantly improved early in both cell therapy groups (P < .05). However, at later stages of the study, group Y showed significantly better function which correlated with decreased scar deposition. Conclusions. The significant difference between young and old cells indicates the possible advantage for allotransplanting MSCs from young donors to elderly patients with MI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it