MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169379585 · doi:10.1177/1477153513481375

CRI2012: A proposal for updating the CIE colour rendering index

2013· article· en· W2169379585 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLighting Research & Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRendering (computer graphics)ReflectivityChromatic adaptationColor rendering indexColour differenceNarrowbandMathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceChromatic scaleComputer visionOpticsWhite lightPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CIE colour rendering index (CRI) has been criticized for its poor correlation with the visual colour rendering of many spiked or narrowband sources, its outdated colour space and chromatic adaptation transform and the use of a small number of non-optimal reflectance samples that have enabled lamp manufacturers to tune the spectrum of a light source to yield, in some cases, inappropriately high general CRI values. The CRI2012 metric proposed in this paper addresses these criticisms by combining the most state of the art colorimetric colour difference model, i.e. CAM02-UCS, with a mathematical reflectance set that exhibits a highly uniform spectral sensitivity. A set of 210 real reflectance samples has also been selected to provide additional information on the expected colour shifts when changing illumination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it