CRI2012: A proposal for updating the CIE colour rendering index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CIE colour rendering index (CRI) has been criticized for its poor correlation with the visual colour rendering of many spiked or narrowband sources, its outdated colour space and chromatic adaptation transform and the use of a small number of non-optimal reflectance samples that have enabled lamp manufacturers to tune the spectrum of a light source to yield, in some cases, inappropriately high general CRI values. The CRI2012 metric proposed in this paper addresses these criticisms by combining the most state of the art colorimetric colour difference model, i.e. CAM02-UCS, with a mathematical reflectance set that exhibits a highly uniform spectral sensitivity. A set of 210 real reflectance samples has also been selected to provide additional information on the expected colour shifts when changing illumination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.104 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".