MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169387377 · doi:10.12957/soletras.2009.6296

UMA TRAJETÓRIA SOBRE O ESTATUTO SINTÁTICO DO SN EM DIREÇÃO AO CONCEITO DE CONVERGÊNCIA

2009· article· pt· W2169387377 on OpenAlexaff
Bruna Karla Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista SOLETRAS · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Análises de sentenças com verbos “ter” e “haver” revelaramnos,pelo menos, três abordagens diversas no que se refere ao estatutodo SN, que ora é concebido como sujeito, ora como objeto, oracomo predicativo. Entretanto, caminharemos no sentido de mostrarque não é possível definir um único status sintático para este SN,pois a sua configuração gramatical supera os limites da cadeia linguística,tais como a posição e a concordância. Assim, para nós, háuma convergência dos lugares de sujeito e objeto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.014
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista SOLETRASSame topicLinguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207