MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169417249 · doi:10.1109/apec.1993.290770

Input filter design for PWM current-source rectifiers

2002· article· en· W2169417249 on OpenAlexafffund
Navid R. Zargari, G. Joós, P.D. Ziogas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport Québec
KeywordsPulse-width modulationHarmonicsTotal harmonic distortionElectronic engineeringConvertersHarmonicComputer scienceHarmonic analysisControl theory (sociology)Filter (signal processing)Current sourceElectronic filterCurrent (fluid)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsAcousticsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulse width modulated (PWM) rectifiers allow the elimination of low order harmonics. Filtering requirements for PWM current-source rectifiers are usually satisfied through the use of low-pass LC input filters. The design of LC filters involves the positioning of the resonant frequency to meet the harmonic attenuation requirements (THD), and the introduction of damping at the resonant frequency to avoid amplification of residual harmonics. The systematic approach proposed is focused on PWM rectifiers but can be extended to other classes of converters. Practical design considerations are detailed and design equations are derived. Simulated results are presented to validate the design approach.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207