Interparietal Herniation: A Rare Cause of Intestinal Obstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An interparietal hernia is a rare form of hernia seen in the inguinal region. Its pathogenesis is not well understood. It frequently causes intestinal obstruction. We presented a case of interparietal herniation, who presented with acute symptoms and signs of intestinal obst ruction. The male patient was referred to our department with acute signs of intestinal obstruction for three days. His physical examination revealed acute abdomen and intestinal obstruction. The ultrasound and computed tomography depicted an intra-abdominal mass of unknown origin. At operation, a loop of ileum was found incarcerate d in an interparietal hernia. Reduction, resection and anastomosing of the segment were facilitated. The preperitoneal type of defect was closed with sutures. Interparietal hernias are rare, and represent a problem in the differential diagnosis of conditions functional in the inguinal region. It is more frequent in the males, and mostly presents with intestinal obstruction. Preoperative diagnosis of obstructing interparietal hernia is difficult. Once considered, its diagnosis and treatment is straightforward. doi:10.4021/jmc38w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".