Congestion-driven regional re-clustering for low-cost FPGAs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FPGA device area is dominated by a limited amount of interconnect. CAD tools must meet a hard channel-width constraint for a circuit to be successfully mapped to a device. Previous work has shown that if a design cannot be mapped to a device due to insufficient interconnect availability, it is possible to identify regions of high interconnect demand and spread out the logic in this area into surrounding regions. This is done by re-packing logic in the affected regions into an increased number of CLBs. This increases the effective amount of interconnect in these high-demand areas. This methodology has been shown to significantly reduce channel width, at the expense of CLB count and runtime. In this paper, we extend this previous algorithm in two ways: we present novel region selection techniques to optimize the selection of which regions should be depopulated, and we introduce a local channel-width demand model which can be used to more accurately determine the amount of white space insertion at each iteration. Together, these techniques lead to significant run-time improvements and reduce the area of the resulting FPGA implementations. We were able to improve runtime by a factor of up to 5.5 times while reducing area by up to 20% when compared to previous methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".