MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling Member Behaviour in on-Line User-Generated Content Sites: A Semiparametric Bayesian Approach

2011· article· en· W2169504063 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Young-Hoon Park, Chang Hee Park, Pulak Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork University
KeywordsBivariate analysisEvent (particle physics)User-generated contentComputer scienceEconometricsSet (abstract data type)Bayesian probabilityLine (geometry)Linear modelMachine learningArtificial intelligenceSocial mediaMathematicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary We develop a model to understand and describe the inherent behaviours and interactions of members over time through the medium of user-generated content (UGC) in an on-line community. Because the behavioural event counts of generating and accessing UGC by on-line users serve as the two most important metrics to judge the success of on-line communities, we propose a bivariate zero-inflated Poisson model to model simultaneously the daily counts of the two main UGC-related activities. In particular, we consider interdependences of the repeatedly measured behavioural events within members, model the dependence of the current event counts on the past event counts and explore the probable non-linear effects of time at the individual level. Furthermore, we incorporate interactions between members by constructing a set of individual-specific time varying measures in an integrated modelling framework. In our empirical applications, we examine key behavioural determinants influencing member behaviours in the UGC site. As part of our substantive contribution, we highlight the model’s ability to make accurate predictions about the evolution of the on-line community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207