Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l’auteur refait l’analyse de ses vieilles données sur les Autochtones du Canada, en bonne partie non publiées, afin d’éclaircir la méthode structurale, mais surtout pour aborder la question de l’identité citoyenne autochtone, à l’aide du concept de la « citoyenneté double ». Ces données indiquent que la Danse du Soleil des Sangs, observée en 1965, insère des narrations catholique et mormone dans la mythologie sans changer l’armature algonquine du passé, tandis que l’interprétation et la ritualisation autochtone de ce mélange de récits exprime très bien les soucis des Sangs contemporains. En y ajoutant l’analyse d’un mouvement de renouveau de la société métisse du Manitoba, on développe le concept de la « symbiose du renoncement » qui rend compte de la praxis de l’idéologie citoyenne autochtone, assortie de l’absorption de toutes les pressions assimilatrices. La citoyenneté double est un état précaire dont la survie dépend d’une vigilance redoublée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".