MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169554230 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-30-1-17

Height growth and vertical development of an old-growth <i>Pseudotsuga</i>-<i>Tsuga</i> forest in southwestern Washington State, U.S.A.

2000· article· en· W2169554230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hiroaki Ishii, Joel H. Reynolds, E. David Ford, David C. Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPacific Northwest Research StationU.S. Forest ServiceUniversity of WashingtonU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsTsugaDouglas firForestryBiologyBotanyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A detailed analysis of diameter-height relationships was applied to an old-growth Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.)Franco var.menziesii -Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.)Sarg.forest in southwestern Washington State, U.S.A., to predict future development of vertical stratification among tree species.Differences among species in relative abundance and size structure resulted in diameter-height regressions of varying certainty and stability.Damage and shading had negative impacts on predicted heights and estimates of maximum attainable height (H max ) in all species.However, species varied as to the main causes and size dependency of damage in relation to tree height.Current height-growth rates of the upper canopy species declined with increasing tree height, reaching minimum values near the predicted H max .The future development of the forest canopy would involve a slow invasion of the upper canopy by Tsuga heterophylla and Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don, as P. menziesii are near their maximum attainable height, and Abies amabilis Dougl.ex Forbes and Taxus brevifolia Nutt.are restricted to the middle to lower canopy.However, if current heightgrowth rates continue, P. menziesii should maintain its dominant status in the upper canopy for at least another century.Résumé : Une analyse détaillée de la relation diamètre--hauteur a été appliquée à une vieille forêt de Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.)Franco var.menziesii -Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.)Sarg., dans le sud-ouest de l'État de Washington, aux États-Unis, afin de prédire le développement futur de la stratification verticale des espèces arborescentes.Les différences dans l'abondance relative et la structure des dimensions entre les espèces faisaient que les régressions entre le diamètre et la hauteur avaient un degré de certitude et de stabilité variable.Les dommages et l'ombrage avaient un impact négatif sur les hauteurs prédites et sur les estimés de la hauteur maximale potentielle (H max ) de toutes les espèces.Cependant, les espèces différaient quant aux principales causes de dommages et leur impact selon la dimension en relation avec la hauteur des arbres.Le taux actuel de croissance en hauteur des espèces de la canopée supérieure diminue en fonction de la hauteur de l'arbre, atteignant des valeurs minimales près de H max estimé.Le développement futur de la canopée de la forêt entraînera une invasion lente de la canopée supérieure par le Tsuga heterophylla et le Thuja plicata Donn ex.D. Don, vu que le P. menziesii est près de sa hauteur maximale potentielle et que l'Abies amabilis Dougl.ex Forbes et le Taxus brevifolia Nutt.sont limités aux canopées moyenne et inférieure.Toutefois, si le taux d'accroissement en hauteur actuel se maintient, le P. menziesii pourrait garder son statut dominant dans la canopée supérieure pour au moins un autre siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207