Stratégies pédagogiques et apprentissage d’une tâche motrice discrète chez des enfants de huit à dix ans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article compare les effets de stratégies pédagogiques d’imagerie mentale combinée à la pratique physique, de pratique physique spécifique et de pratique physique variable sur l’apprentissage d’une tâche motrice discrète chez des enfants de huit à dix ans. La tâche expérimentale consistait à imprimer à une voiture miniature une poussée de la main non dominante pour qu’elle atteigne, après un temps de mouvement bien déterminé, une distance cible. Les résultats ont démontré que les performances obtenues par les participants des différentes stratégies pédagogiques varient en fonction de plusieurs facteurs tels que la variable dépendante mesurée ; le paramètre du mouvement ; le sexe des participants ; etc. Ces résultats furent discutés à la lumière de la théorie piagétienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".