MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169586111 · doi:10.1109/pes.2009.5275595

Power system stabilizers in variable speed wind farms

2009· article· en· W2169586111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric power systemControl theory (sociology)Wind powerWind speedRotational speedController (irrigation)Power (physics)Rotor (electric)EngineeringStabilizer (aeronautics)Variable (mathematics)AC powerBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringVoltageControl (management)TelecommunicationsPhysicsAerospace engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchronous generators in a power system exhibit rotor oscillations around their nominal steady state rotational speed. Conventional power system stabilizers have limited damping capability of inter-area mode of oscillations, when the frequencies lie beyond their bandwidth. Variable speed wind generators, with fast real and reactive power regulation capabilities, are being integrated into power systems. This paper investigates different power system stabilizer designs and damping strategies suitable for variable speed wind farm applications. Based on damping applications with flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) and HVDC, the paper investigates how power system stabilizer functions can be integrated into the wind farm controller and their effectiveness. Testing scenarios include different locations of wind farm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207