MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2169594746 · doi:10.4141/p04-196

Inheritance of resistance to covered smut [<i>Ustilago hordei</i> (Pers.) Lagerh.] in barley

2006· article· en· W2169594746 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tajinder S. Grewal, B. G. Rossnagel, G. J. Scoles

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySmutUstilagoHordeum vulgareCultivarResistance (ecology)PopulationAgronomyBotanyPoaceaeGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covered smut of barley, caused by Ustilago hordei, has the potential to cause significant losses under organic production systems, particularly for hulless barley. The objectives of this investigation were to identify sources of resistance to covered smut and to study the inheritance of resistance and allelic relations between resistant barley lines. Hulled barley breeding lines and cultivars TR640, Q21861, TR244, and CDC Helgason were identified as sources of resistance to covered smut based on screening for 3–5 yr in the field and twice in the greenhouse. No hulless sources with strong resistance were identified indicating that there is a need to transfer resistance to hulless barley. Inheritance of covered smut resistance in the hulled barley line TR244 was studied using a hulless × hulled barley population screened with a mixture of U. hordei isolates. A single major resistance gene was identified in TR244. Many hulless lines in this population showed good resistance to covered smut indicating that resistance can be transferred to hulless lines. Allelic studies indicated that the resistance gene in TR244 is different from that in the resistant lines Q21861 and TR640. Key words: Barley, Ustilago hordei, resistance, hulless, covered smut

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→French-language works237,207→