MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169604954 · doi:10.1109/acssc.1992.269176

Blind deconvolution based on cumulant fitting and simulated annealing optimization

2003· article· en· W2169604954 on OpenAlexaff
Jacek Ilow, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, A.N. Venetsanopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlind equalizationDeconvolutionSimulated annealingAlgorithmBlind deconvolutionHigher-order statisticsComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)QAMTransfer functionConvergence (economics)Quadrature amplitude modulationMathematical optimizationMathematicsSignal processingEqualizerDecoding methodsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Higher order cumulant analysis is applied to the blind identification/equalization of linear moving average (MA) channels with QAM data. To identify the MA parameters of channels, a higher order cumulant fitting approach is adopted. The set of channel parameters is obtained by simulated annealing optimization, which overcomes the problem of a multimodal cost function in channel identification. The coefficients of a linear equalizer are obtained using the channel inversion algorithm. Batch type as well as batch recursive algorithms are investigated. The feasibility and convergence behavior of the proposed algorithms are examined by means of computer simulations.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207