Activation of Ultrathin Films of Hematite for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting via H<sub>2</sub> Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermal treatment of ultrathin films of hematite (α-Fe2 O3 ) under an atmosphere of 5 % H2 in Ar is presented as a means of activating α-Fe2 O3 towards the photoelectrochemical splitting of water. Spin-coated films annealed in air exhibited no photoactivity, whereas films treated in hydrogen exhibited a photocurrent response. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy results showed that the H2 -treated films contain oxygen vacancies, which suggests improved charge transport. However, Tafel slopes, scan-rate dependent measurements, and kinetic analyses performed by using H2 O2 as a hole scavenger suggested that surface modification may also contribute to their induced photoactivity. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results revealed the buildup of a surface trap capacitance at the point of photocurrent onset for the hydrogen-treated films under illumination. A decrease in charge trapping resistance was also observed, which suggests improved transport of charges away from the surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".