Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, le débat sur l'avortement, qui est en grande partie d'ordre moral et éthique, favorise pour la femme et par ricochet pour son médecin l'expression de croyances dictées par leurs consciences individuelles. Au Canada, la liberté de conscience constitue une liberté fondamentale. Par contre, l'exercice de cette liberté par le médecin est limité soit par les droits et libertés fondamentaux du patient ou encore par les droits des patients à recevoir des services de santé. Par ailleurs, en France, le législateur qui est intervenu afin de décriminaliser l'avortement a permis expressément, mais selon certaines conditions, aux professionnels de la santé de refuser de participer à une interruption volontaire de grossesse par le biais d'une objection de conscience. L'objet de cette étude porte donc sur l'avortement et l'objection de conscience du médecin à la lumière du droit tant canadien que québécois et français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".