MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169617207 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2005.1543299

Adaptive Multistage Detection for DS-CDMA Systems in Multipath Fading Channels

2005· article· en· W2169617207 on OpenAlexafffund
Min Li, Walaa Hamouda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsFadingCode division multiple accessMultiuser detectionMultipath propagationComputer scienceDetectorSingle antenna interference cancellationSpread spectrumAlgorithmUpper and lower boundsInterference (communication)Electronic engineeringFading distributionTelecommunicationsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Rayleigh fadingDecoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose an adaptive multistage detection scheme with low complexity for direct-sequence code-division multiple-access (DS-CDMA) systems in the presence of flat and frequency-selective fading. The first stage consists of a blind adaptive multiuser detector based on the linear constrained minimum variance (LCMV) criterion. The interference cancellation (IC) occurs in the second stage. The performance of the proposed iterative detector over both flat and frequency-selective fading channels is investigated and compared to the single-user bound. In all cases, the proposed iterative receiver is shown to offer a substantial performance improvement and a large gain in user capacity relative to the standard LCMV. In flat fading channels, our results show that the performance of the proposed detector is very close to the single-user bound. On the other hand, the performance of the iterative receiver over frequency-selective channels is noted to be in the order of 1 dB far from the single-user bound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207