MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169632935 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200460451

High magnetic field studies of AlGaN/GaN heterostructures grown on bulk GaN

2005· article· en· W2169632935 on OpenAlexaff
M. Siekacz, K. Dybko, C. Skierbiszewski, W. Knap, Z. R. Wasilewski, D. K. Maude, J. Łusakowski, W. Krupczyński, G. Nowak, Michał Boćkowski, S. Porowski

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterojunctionMagnetoresistanceMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsMagnetic fieldAtmospheric temperature rangeHall effectSubstrate (aquarium)Electron mobilityThermal conductionOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present transport properties of AlGaN/GaN heterostructures grown over high-pressure bulk GaN substrates. The experimental results include the conductivity tensor measurements in a magnetic field up to 23 T in a wide temperature range 2 K–300 K for Hall bar samples. The room temperature high field data allow us to clearly separate contributions of a parasitic parallel conduction from 2DEG conduction in all investigated heterostructures. The room temperature mobility limit for 2D electrons in GaN/AlGaN heterojunctions grown on defect free GaN bulk substrates is around 2400 cm2/Vs. The Quantum Hall Effect studies are performed in the magnetic fields up to 23 T and temperatures between 1.6 K and 15 K This high magnetic field in combination with very high mobility (over 60000 cm2/Vs) in the sample grown on the bulk GaN substrate allow us to determine the activation energy in cyclotron gap from longitudinal magnetoresistance. (© 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207