Base pressure prediction in bluff-body potential-flow models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a recent study by Yeung & Parkinson (1997), a wake width was proposed which allowed the bluff-body potential-flow model by Parkinson & Jandali (1970) to be extended to include the flow around an oblique flat plate. By incorporating this wake width in the momentum equation originally derived by Eppler (1954) for separated flow, the drag of the plate is related to its inclination and base pressure through a simple analytical condition. It allows the base pressure, which is usually treated as an empirical input, to be determined theoretically and thus the model becomes self-contained. Predictions of the base pressure, drag and width of wake are found to be in reasonable agreement with the experimental data. When applied to the symmetrical flow around a wedge of arbitrary vertex angle, similar agreement with experimental measurements is obtained as well. It is also demonstrated that this condition is compatible with the free-streamline models by Wu (1962) and Wu & Wang (1964) such that the corresponding predictions are in good agreement with experiment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".