Response of the Endophytic Diazotroph <i>Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus</i> on Solid Media to Changes in Atmospheric Partial O <sub>2</sub> Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus is an N(2)-fixing endophyte isolated from sugarcane. G. diazotrophicus was grown on solid medium at atmospheric partial O(2) pressures (pO(2)) of 10, 20, and 30 kPa for 5 to 6 days. Using a flowthrough gas exchange system, nitrogenase activity and respiration rate were then measured at a range of atmospheric pO(2) (5 to 60 kPa). Nitrogenase activity was measured by H(2) evolution in N(2)-O(2) and in Ar-O(2), and respiration rate was measured by CO(2) evolution in N(2)-O(2). To validate the use of H(2) production as an assay for nitrogenase activity, a non-N(2)-fixing (Nif(-)) mutant of G. diazotrophicus was tested and found to have a low rate of uptake hydrogenase (Hup(+)) activity (0.016 +/- 0.009 micromol of H(2) 10(10) cells(-1) h(-1)) when incubated in an atmosphere enriched in H(2). However, Hup(+) activity was not detectable under the normal assay conditions used in our experiments. G. diazotrophicus fixed nitrogen at all atmospheric pO(2) tested. However, when the assay atmospheric pO(2) was below the level at which the colonies had been grown, nitrogenase activity was decreased. Optimal atmospheric pO(2) for nitrogenase activity was 0 to 20 kPa above the pO(2) at which the bacteria had been grown. As atmospheric pO(2) was increased in 10-kPa steps to the highest levels (40 to 60 kPa), nitrogenase activity decreased in a stepwise manner. Despite the decrease in nitrogenase activity as atmospheric pO(2) was increased, respiration rate increased marginally. A large single-step increase in atmospheric pO(2) from 20 to 60 kPa caused a rapid 84% decrease in nitrogenase activity. However, upon returning to 20 kPa of O(2), 80% of nitrogenase activity was recovered within 10 min, indicating a "switch-off/switch-on" O(2) protection mechanism of nitrogenase activity. Our study demonstrates that colonies of G. diazotrophicus can fix N(2) at a wide range of atmospheric pO(2) and can adapt to maintain nitrogenase activity in response to both long-term and short-term changes in atmospheric pO(2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".