Physiological Differences in Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1) Phosphorylation in IGFBP-1 Transgenic Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-1 has been shown to alter cellular responses to insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Human IGFBP-1 undergoes serine phosphorylation, and this enhances both its affinity for IGF-1 by six- to eightfold and its capacity to inhibit IGF-1 actions. To investigate the physiological role of IGFBP-1 in vivo, transgenic mice have been generated using either the human IGFBP-1 or rat IGFBP-1 transgene. Both lines of mice expressed high concentrations of IGFBP-1 in serum and tissues; however, human IGFBP-1 transgenic mice did not show glucose intolerance and exhibited no significant intrauterine growth retardation, whereas rat IGFBP-1 transgenic mice showed fasting hyperglycemia and intrauterine growth restriction. The aim of this study was to investigate the physiological differences in the phosphorylation state of human IGFBP-1 and rat IGFBP-1 in these transgenic mice. The phosphorylation status of IGFBP-1 in transgenic mouse serum was analyzed by nondenaturing PAGE. Almost all of the IGFBP-1 in serum from the human IGFBP-1 transgenic mice was present as a nonphosphorylated form. Most of the rat IGFBP-1 in the serum of the mice expressing the rat IGFBP-1 was phosphorylated. Immunoprecipitation showed that mouse hepatoma (Hepa 1-6) cells (exposed to [32P]H3PO4) secrete 32P-labeled IGFBP-1. When the human IGFBP-1 transgene was transfected into Hepa 1-6 cells, all of the IGFBP-1 was secreted in the nonphosphorylated form. However, when the rat IGFBP-1 transgene was transfected into these cells, phosphorylated forms of IGFBP-1 were secreted. To confirm this result, the mouse hepatoma cell protein kinase was partially purified. This kinase activity phosphorylated mouse and rat IGFBP-1 in vitro, but it did not phosphorylate human IGFBP-1. Scatchard analysis showed that the affinity of phosphorylated rat IGFBP-1 for IGF-1 was 3.9-fold higher than that of nonphosphorylated human IGFBP-1. We conclude that the mouse IGFBP-1 kinase activity cannot phosphorylate human IGFBP-1, whereas it can phosphorylate rat IGFBP-1. The phosphorylation state of human IGFBP-1 may account for part of the phenotypic differences noted in the two studies of transgenic mice, and it is an important determinant of the capacity of human IGFBP-1 to inhibit IGF-1 actions in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".