MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169692027 · doi:10.1109/hicss.1998.649214

An object-oriented layered approach to interfaces for hardware/software codesign of embedded systems

2002· article· en· W2169692027 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftwareEmbedded systemWorkstationHost (biology)Object-oriented programmingComponent-based software engineeringSoftware prototypingInteroperabilitySoftware systemOperating systemComputer architectureSoftware developmentComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Microelectronics Corporation has developed and distributed a rapid prototyping board (RPB) to facilitate research in hardware/software (HW/SW) codesign, case studies, applications and prototyping of projects in embedded systems. This research develops a series of layers between hardware and software, exploiting the dynamically reconfigurable hardware of the RPB and creating the connection to host processes and software layers in general, both on the board itself, and between a HW/SW system downloaded to the board and its host workstation. We describe a new approach which uses object oriented technology as the basis for the system design methodology, the specifications and the implementation, providing a flexible and dynamic foundation, lending itself to further expansion and research in HW/SW codesign.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207