MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169696642 · doi:10.1287/moor.1090.0416

Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Semi-Infinite Programming via Partitions

2009· article· en· W2169696642 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Operations Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsMathematicsLinear programmingBellman equationMathematical optimizationFunction (biology)Partition (number theory)Sensitivity (control systems)Applied mathematicsConvex functionExtension (predicate logic)Linear-fractional programmingDomain (mathematical analysis)Regular polygonCombinatoricsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides sufficient conditions for the optimal value function of a given linear semi-infinite programming (LSIP) problem to depend linearly on the size of the perturbations, when these perturbations involve either the cost coefficients or the right-hand side function or both, and they are sufficiently small. Two kinds of partitions are considered. The first concerns the effective domain of the optimal value as a function of the cost coefficients and consists of maximal regions on which this value function is linear. The second class of partitions considered in this paper concerns the index set of the constraints through a suitable extension of the concept of optimal partition from ordinary to LSIP. These partitions provide convex sets, in particular, segments, on which the optimal value is a linear function of the size of the perturbations, for the three types of perturbations considered in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it