MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169720040 · doi:10.1086/427538

A Revised Geometry for the Magnetic Wind of<i>θ</i><sup>1</sup>Orionis C

2005· article· en· W2169720040 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Smith, A. W. Fullerton

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsRADIUSRadiative transferStarsMagnetic fieldOutflowRedshiftAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The star θ 1 Orionis C (O6–7 V) is often cited as a hot analog of Bp variables, because its optical and UV line and X‐ray continuum fluxes modulate over the magnetic/rotational period. In this circumstance, one expects emission and absorption components of the UV resonance lines to vary as a flattened magnetosphere corotates with the star. In this paper, we reexamine the detailed velocity behavior of several strong UV lines. Whereas past work has focused on variations of the full profiles, we find that the blue and red wings of the C iv and N v resonance lines exhibit anticorrelated modulations. These appear as absorption excesses at large blueshifts and as flux elevations at moderate redshifts at the edge‐on phase ϕ = 0.5. No rest‐frame absorption features, which are the typical signatures of cool, static disks surrounding Bp stars, can be detected at any phase. We suggest that this behavior is caused by two geometrically distinct components of the wind, which are defined by the relationship between the extent of a magnetic loop and the local Alfvén radius. Streams on field lines opening outside this radius are first channeled toward the magnetic equator, but after reaching the Alfven radius, they are forced outward by radiative forces, eventually to become an expanding radial outflow. This wind component causes blueshifted absorption as the corotating magnetic equatorial plane crosses the observer's line of sight (ϕ = 0.5). The geometry of the inner component requires a more complicated interpretation. Wind streams first follow closed loops and collide at the magnetic equator with counterpart streams from the opposite pole. There they coalesce and fall back to the star along their original field lines. The high temperatures in these falling condensations cause the redshifted emission. The rapid circulation of these flows is likely the reason for the absence of signatures of a cool disk (e.g., zero‐velocity absorptions at ϕ∼0.5) in the strong UV lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of the PacificSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207