MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169723419 · doi:10.1109/icip.2005.1530026

Optimization of cluster coverage for road centre-line extraction in high resolution satellite images

2005· article· en· W2169723419 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePixelArtificial intelligenceCluster (spacecraft)Computer visionImage segmentationSegmentationNoise (video)Line (geometry)SatelliteProcess (computing)Image resolutionLine segmentFeature extractionCover (algebra)Image (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new approach for road centre-line extraction from high-resolution images, based on cluster coverage. The idea is first to segment the image; in order to obtain road candidates. Then we apply the k-means algorithm to cluster the pixels of the segmented image. The resulting clusters cover the road and the noise generated by the segmentation process. We introduce the concept of cluster coverage to remove noise and to approximate the optimal number of clusters that fit the shape of the road.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207