MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169723483 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2003.822234

On the design of large receiver and transmitter arrays for OE-VLSI applications

2003· article· en· W2169723483 on OpenAlex
Michael B. Venditti, David V. Plant

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationTransmitterElectronic engineeringTestabilityElectronic circuitComputer scienceChipDifferential (mechanical device)EngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design environment, design and test flows, and the constraints and challenges of implementing large two-dimensional arrays of receiver and transmitter circuits for optoelectronic-very-large-scale-integration (OE-VLSI) applications is described, and the use of optically and electrically differential architectures is advocated. We show that the incorporation of design-for-testability features and chip-level test methodologies overcome some of the unique challenges of testing OE-VLSI receiver and transmitter circuits. We present design techniques that can be used to improve the switching-noise performance of fully differential OE-VLSI receiver and transmitter circuits. We show that the operational yield of large receiver arrays is maximized through the use of an optically and electrically differential architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it