Dynamic Capacity Expansion for a Service Firm with Capacity Deterioration and Supply Uncertainty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivated by the challenges faced by the telecom industry during the past decade, in this paper we study a dynamic capacity expansion problem for service firms. There is a random demand for the firm's capacity in each period: the demand in excess of the capacity is lost, and revenue is generated for the fulfilled demand. At the beginning of each period, the firm might increase its capacity through purchasing equipment for immediate delivery, which is constrained by a random supply limit, or it might sign a future contract for equipment delivery in the following period. We assume that the firm's capacity might partially become obsolete due to natural deterioration or technology innovation. We aim at characterizing optimal capacity expansion strategies and comparing the profit functions as well as the optimal control policies of different options. Specifically, we show that the optimal capacity expansion policy for the current period is determined by a base-stock policy. Compared with the case where no future contracts are available, the optimal control parameters of capacity expansion are always smaller. We further show that when the obsolescence rate is deterministic, the optimal policy for capacity expansion through future contracts is also a base-stock type. The results are extended to the cases with stochastically dependent capacity supply limits and stochastically dependent demand processes, which establish the robustness of the optimal policy in various market conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it