MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169746365 · doi:10.1287/opre.1080.0522

Dynamic Capacity Expansion for a Service Firm with Capacity Deterioration and Supply Uncertainty

2008· article· en· W2169746365 on OpenAlexaff
Xiuli Chao, Hong Chen, Shaohui Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCapital Investment and Risk Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObsolescenceRevenueProfit (economics)Stock (firearms)MicroeconomicsEconomicsPurchasingCapacity utilizationIndustrial organizationBusinessOperations managementFinanceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the challenges faced by the telecom industry during the past decade, in this paper we study a dynamic capacity expansion problem for service firms. There is a random demand for the firm's capacity in each period: the demand in excess of the capacity is lost, and revenue is generated for the fulfilled demand. At the beginning of each period, the firm might increase its capacity through purchasing equipment for immediate delivery, which is constrained by a random supply limit, or it might sign a future contract for equipment delivery in the following period. We assume that the firm's capacity might partially become obsolete due to natural deterioration or technology innovation. We aim at characterizing optimal capacity expansion strategies and comparing the profit functions as well as the optimal control policies of different options. Specifically, we show that the optimal capacity expansion policy for the current period is determined by a base-stock policy. Compared with the case where no future contracts are available, the optimal control parameters of capacity expansion are always smaller. We further show that when the obsolescence rate is deterministic, the optimal policy for capacity expansion through future contracts is also a base-stock type. The results are extended to the cases with stochastically dependent capacity supply limits and stochastically dependent demand processes, which establish the robustness of the optimal policy in various market conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOperations ResearchSame topicCapital Investment and Risk AnalysisFrench-language works237,207