MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Crossing mice deficient in eNOS with placental-specific Igf2 knockout mice: A new model of fetal growth restriction

2012· article· en· W2169747371 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Dilworth, Laura C. Kusinski, Bernadette Baker, Lewis Renshall, Philip N. Baker, Susan Greenwood, Mark Wareing, Colin P. Sibley

Bibliographic record

VenuePlacenta · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsEnosKnockout mouseFetusFetal growthIntrauterine growth restrictionBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicinePhenotypePlacentaGene knockoutUmbilical veinAndrologyNitric oxidePregnancyNitric oxide synthaseGeneticsMedicineGeneIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We tested the hypothesis that crossing two mouse models of fetal growth restriction (FGR) of differing phenotype would induce more severe FGR than either model alone. Female endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout mice (eNOS(-/-)) were mated with placental-specific Igf2 knockout males (P0). Resultant fetuses were no more growth restricted than those with P0 deletion alone. However, P0 deletion attenuated the reduced placental system A amino acid transporter activity previously observed in eNOS(-/-) mice. Manipulating maternal and fetal genotypes provides a means to compare maternal and fetal regulation of fetal growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlacentaSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207