MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169764592 · doi:10.7202/030069ar

La Gestalt Synergy

2006· article· fr· W2169764592 on OpenAlex
Lise Carpentier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Therapy and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyGestalt psychologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parmi toutes les approches thérapeutiques qui ont essayé de réunir dans leur étude le corps et la psyché de façon à traiter l'individu dans sa globalité, la Gestalt Synergy est la seule à s'être inspirée, en plus de la Gestalt (comme son nom l'indique), de deux approches de rééducation physique, soit celle de F. M. Alexander et de Moshe Feldenkrais. Ces deux auteurs - on le verra plus loin - ont développé leur intérêt pour l'étude du corps à partir d'un problème physique personnel et ont apporté une contribution remarquable à la compréhension du fonctionnement de la mécanique corporelle. Aborder le corps en tant que mécanique physique est très différent de l'aborder en tant que mécanique psychologique. L'originalité de la Gestalt Synergy, approche créée et développée par Ilana Rubenfeld, consistera à réunir théoriquement et pratiquement ces deux points de vue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it