MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169794055 · doi:10.1109/pica.2001.932346

Benefits of special protection systems in competitive market

2002· article· en· W2169794055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlackoutElectric power systemReliability engineeringRobustness (evolution)Load SheddingReliability (semiconductor)Computer sciencePower-system protectionRisk analysis (engineering)EngineeringBusinessPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Special protection systems (SPS) play an important role in the improvement of power system reliability. SPS help to prevent blackout of power systems. SPS offer other benefits and their use may represent more profits for utilities. For instance, the installation of a SPS can help to relax some constraints for the operation of a power system. SPS offer also benefits to customers. Hydro Quebec used SPS for more than 20 years. This SPS is composed of remote load shedding system and underfrequency relays installed in 140 substations. This system has improved the reliability and robustness of the Hydro Quebec power system. This experience has proved that both utility and customers can get benefits from SPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionFrench-language works237,207