MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169830373 · doi:10.5539/jas.v5n10p56

Influence of Contaminated Crop Remains and Seed Health Quality on the Intensity of Bean Anthracnose

2013· article· en· W2169830373 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marília G. Silva, Edson Ampélio Pozza, José C. Machado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCornell University Agricultural Experiment StationFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsCropColletotrichum lindemuthianumSowingAgronomyBiologyCrop yieldYield (engineering)Field trialHorticultureCultivar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bean anthracnose, caused by the fungus Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, is a major seed borne disease of beans, interfering with the progress of the disease timeline. Work involving the study of cultural remains are scarce. The effects of different incidences of that pathogen in seeds in combination with cultivating areas with and without contaminated crop remains were evaluated on the anthracnose incidence and severity and on yield. In the trial set up in December 2009 the cultivation of bean in area with contaminated crop remains had greater progress for both incidence and severity of the disease compared with the area without crop remains. There was interaction between infection levels in seeds with or without contaminated crop remains in both growing areas. In the trial set up in April 2010 progress of anthracnose was similar in both growing areas. Grain yield was higher in the area without crop remains in both trials. The results of this work showed that the behavior of anthracnose under field conditions differ among areas studied (with and without crop residues) and also due to the environmental conditions of a planting to another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207