La stratégie du Canada en matière de cybersécurité : de la parole aux actes?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une analyse du comportement du Canada dans le cyberespace et plus spécifiquement de la stratégie canadienne de cyber-sécurité. Dans cet objectif, nous tentons de répondre à la question suivante: que fait le Canada dans le cyberespace? Après avoir défini le débat théorique sur la possibilité pour les États de réguler le cyberespace, l'article décrit les étapes principales du développement de la stratégie canadienne de cyber-sécurité. Aussi, il coïncide avec le développement de la technologie informatique au début des années 90, et est accéléré dans la décennie 2001-2011 en raison d'un contexte international incertain. En guise de conclusion, l'article offre une analyse des initiatives canadiennes récentes sur la cyber-sécurité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".