Bayesian markrecapture estimation with an application to a salmonid smolt population
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We developed a Bayesian probability model for markrecapture data. Three alternative versions of the model were applied to two sets of data on the abundance of migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt populations, and the results were then compared with those of two widely used maximum likelihood models (Petersen method and a model using stratified data). Our model follows the basic principles of stochastic models presented for stratified data. In contrast to the earlier models, our model can deal with sparse data. Moreover, even weak dependencies between the studied parameters and the possible factors affecting them can be used to improve the plausibility of the estimates. The assumptions behind our approach are more realistic than those of earlier models, taking into account such factors as overdispersion, which is expected to be present in the markrecapture data of salmon smolts because of their schooling behavior. Our examples also show that assumptions about the model structure can have a substantial impact on the resulting inferences on the size of the smolt run, especially in terms of the precision of the estimate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it