MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Alnus nepalensis cultivation on soil biological and physicochemical properties during restoration near a phosphate smelter in Kunyang, Yunnan Province, SW China

2013· article· en· W2169907637 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of soil science and plant nutrition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsRevegetationChemistryEnvironmental remediationMicrobial population biologyNutrientPhosphorusUreaseSoil waterPhosphateAgronomyHorticultureBotanyBiologyEcologyBacteriaEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, soil physicochemical properties, microbial community structure and nematode assemblages were investigated to assess the soil qualities of an in situ phosphate mine after up to 10 years of revegetation with the nurse plant Alnus nepalensis.Our results showed that A. nepalensis cultivation significantly decreased the total P concentration, suggesting the high remediation potential.Moreover, A. nepalensis improved the levels of soil-available N and K and promoted the growth of microorganisms, as suggested by the 1.45-and even 3.26fold increase in microbial carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN), respectively, after 10 years of remediation.Soil enzyme activities relating to C (β-glucosidase), N (urease) and P (acid phosphatase) were also stimulated.The sum of the indicator phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) and the Gram-positive and -negative bacteria also increased significantly after restoration.The nematode density increased gradually from zero in untreated soils to 2.3 g -1 of soil after 10 years of restoration, at which time the highest percentage of plant parasites was observed.Cluster analysis produced three clusters: cultivation for 0 and 1 years in cluster 1; 2, 3 and 4 years in cluster 2; and 5 and 10 years in cluster 3.These results showed that both the nutrient pools and the stability of the soil ecosystems in the revegetated soils were gradually reestablished and that the enzyme activities (β-glucosidase and urease), the microbial community (sum of PLFAs, G + : G -) and the nematode assemblage (density and plant parasite percentage) might be used as valid bioindicators for soil heath after contamination remediation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it