MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169961478 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2011.2181428

Estimation of Required Slack for Conductors Connecting Substation Equipment Subjected to Earthquake

2012· article· en· W2169961478 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Karami Mohammadi, Farzad Nikfar, Vahid Akrami

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenSeesConductorElectrical conductorReliability (semiconductor)EngineeringEarthquake engineeringStructural engineeringComputer scienceReliability engineeringFinite element methodElectrical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Typical electrical substation equipment items are usually connected to each other through flexible conductors. If the connections are not flexible enough, they may cause intense dynamic interaction between the equipment during an earthquake. This research is to analytically study the performance of different flexible conductor configurations used mostly in the interconnected substation items, as well as the effects of parameters. A set of three synthetic ground motions, which are matched with IEEE Standard 693 design spectrum, was created as the design input motions and two sample cases of interconnected equipment were considered to put the proposed method into practice. In order to evaluate the reliability of the proposed approach, two sets of real ground motions recorded on stiff soil were used to assess designed conductor configurations. The capability of the OpenSees model in simulating static and dynamic behavior of conductors is studied as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207