MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169984516

Vocal Music in Eighteenth-century Bath from the Pens of Thomas Linley Senior (1733-95) and Junior (1756-78)

2003· article· en· W2169984516 on OpenAlexaff
Paul F. Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtTheologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the music of the two Thomas Linleys, father and son, is little known today, they were amongst the best-known English composers of their time.Their rise to fame during the 18 th century is all the more remarkable given that their careers were established in Bath, as opposed to London, the musical capital of Britain.John Sainsbury (1825) wrote glowing accounts of both musicians in his A Dictionary of Musicians From the Earliest Times, with that written about the elder Linley being particularly illuminating:As a singing-master and composer, Linley possessed a taste and style peculiarly his own, but still modelled on the principles of that pure English school, which, however overshadowed at present by the foreign structure that has been opposed to it, can never be totally eclipsed while there are any feelings of nature and good sense remaining among us.(II, p. 66) Both Linleys composed concert vocal music for the Bath concerts, as well as writing for the theatres of London.Their music is often strikingly different in style from that which was heard at the concerts of the pleasure gardens of London.I The present paper will attempt to present an overview of this repertoire, and illustrate its stylistic qualities.The Linley family was one the several musical dynasties which helped to shape the musical life of 18 th -century Britain.For over twenty years in Bath, the elder Linley (1733-95) led the varied career of composer, harpsichordist, concert director and singing teacher, at the same time composing for numerous stage works which were presented in London. 2 The concert series which he led in Bath was highly successful, and it often featured the many and varied musical talents of eight of the twelve children born to Linley and his wife, Mary Johnson. 3 The unique social situations that informed life in Georgian Bath appear to have had a deep effect on the music that was composed by both Linleys.Bath was far more than just a spa town with some remarkable Roman architecture.It was a complete social experience for those who spent time in the city.Bryan Little (1992) has remarked that "almost everyone who mattered in Georgian England sooner or later, for medical or social reasons, came to Bath" (p.305).While it had been an important medieval cathedral city, Bath declined in later years.A physical transformation of the town was begun in 1725 under the direction of John Wood which resulted in some of the best examples of the Palladian style (Little, 1992).Elaborate codes of behaviour were designed by Beau Nash, the Master of Ceremonies for the city, who quite ruthlessly imposed these codes on all who came to Bath, be they of noble or common birth.Bath was not only fashionable, but it was a centre for artistic activity, as well.Writers such as Pope, Fielding and Smollett were frequent visitors, and the painters Gainsborough and Thomas Barker took up residence there.Composers and musicians of note were also associated with the city, and the names of Thomas Chilcot, William Croft, J.e. Smith, the two Linleys, William Herschel and Venazio Rauzzini figure prominently in the 18 th century.Linley's concerts were an important aspect of the cultural life of the city, although they were likely on a more intimate scale than those in London because of the smaller population base.Timothy Roberts (1994) has remarked that "the vocal chamber music that Linley composed for such occasions inhabits the same rarefied world as Gainsborough's quasipastoral society portraits" (p.5).Throughout the 18 th century, Bath retained its aura of rarefied sophistication, where the concept of "taste" was given lip service even by those who did not actually possess it (Humphreys, 1992).Linley appears not to have felt any need to write down to the Bath audiences, or to make use of unnecessary musical gestures (such as extravagant passages of coloratura singing) to maintain attention.Certainly, the conditions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)Same topicHistorical Influence and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207