MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169987602 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn321

Use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis

2008· article· en· W2169987602 on OpenAlexaff
Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos, Joanne M. Bargman

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeritoneal dialysisAngiotensin Receptor BlockersAngiotensin-converting enzymeInternal medicineACE inhibitorDialysisHemodialysisChronic renal failureUrologyPharmacologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to improve outcome in patients with renal failure not on dialysis therapy and patients on haemodialysis (HD). However, their effect on survival has not been studied in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The present study examined the association between therapy with ACE inhibitor/ARB and mortality in patients undergoing chronic PD. METHODS: All patients who commenced PD between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2005 at the University Health Network were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they had been treated with ACE inhibitor/ARB. They were followed up from the date of PD initiation until death, cessation of PD, transfer to other centres or to the end of the study (31 December 2006). RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were included in the study. One hundred and sixty-five were treated with ACE inhibitors/ARB (treated group) and 141 were not (untreated group). The treated group patients were younger (56.9 +/- 16.6 versus 62.3 +/- 17.8 years, P < 0.01) and more likely to have a history of hypertension than the untreated group. At the initiation of PD, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were higher in the treated than the untreated group (138.8 +/- 21.8 versus 128.6 +/- 22.4 mmHg, P < 0.001; 79.8 +/- 14.1 versus 74.5 +/- 12.5 mmHg, P = 0.001) and remained significantly higher during the follow-up (133.5 +/- 16.4 versus 125.1 +/- 16.7 mmHg; 77.3 +/- 9.8 versus 73.2 +/- 9.7 mmHg, both P < 0.001). The treated group had a significantly longer survival compared to the untreated group (log rank 19.191, P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, blood pressure and other demographic and clinical parameters, multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling showed that the use of ACE inhibitor/ARB was associated with 62% reduced risk for death (HR 0.382, 95% CI 0.232-0.631, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, ACE inhibitor/ ARB therapy was associated with a dramatically reduced mortality in patients on peritoneal dialysis independent of blood pressure and other clinical and demographic variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207