MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169988092 · doi:10.1017/s1047951108002308

Prenatal diagnosis of topsy-turvy heart

2008· article· en· W2169988092 on OpenAlexaff
Edgar Jaeggi, David Chitayat, Fraser Golding, Peter Kim, Shi‐Joon Yoo

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology in the Young · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyAbnormalityIntracardiac injectionTruncus arteriosusDaughterAortic archInternal medicineSiblingDextrocardiaPrenatal diagnosisHeart diseaseAnatomyAortaPregnancyFetusTetralogy of Fallot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe two siblings of consanguineous parents with a prenatal diagnosis of a currently unique form of congenital cardiac disease characterized by superior-inferior atrial and ventricular arrangement, concordant atrioventricular and ventriculo-arterial connections with normal arterial relationships, and a bizarre topography of the ventricular outlets, with the arterial poles being displaced posterior-inferiorly within the thorax. The abnormally low position of the aortic arch resulted in elongation and stretching of the airways, with severe compression of the trachea and left main bronchus in the surviving sibling. The finding of the same rare abnormality in a son and a daughter born to consanguineous parents supports a single gene disorder with a recessive mode of inheritance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology in the YoungSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207