MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169999300 · doi:10.1002/9780470314555.ch57

High Temperature Strength and Toughness of Electrophoretically Deposited Alumina/Lanthanum Aluminate Laminates

2008· book-chapter· en· W2169999300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCeramic engineering and science proceedings · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialMicrostructureIndentationCeramicCubic zirconiaElectrophoretic depositionFracture toughnessMonolithScanning electron microscopeAluminateToughnessLanthanumCementChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laminar ceramic composites with layers as thin as 2 μm with > 200 layers total and dense interfaces were synthesized by electrophoretic deposition. The microstructure and mechanical behavior of the zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) / La-aluminate system was studied by electron microscopy, microindentation and 4-point bend tests at 25°C and 1300°C. Strength values obtained at these temperatures are 792 MPa and 486 MPa respectively. Crack paths emanating from Vickers indents show increased toughness of the laminate as compared with the alumina monolith.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it