The Cation/Ca2+ Exchanger Superfamily: Phylogenetic Analysis and Structural Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cation/Ca(2+) exchangers are an essential component of Ca(2+) signaling pathways and function to transport cytosolic Ca(2+) across membranes against its electrochemical gradient by utilizing the downhill gradients of other cation species such as H(+), Na(+), or K(+). The cation/Ca(2+) exchanger superfamily is composed of H(+)/Ca(2+) exchangers and Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchangers, which have been investigated extensively in both plant cells and animal cells. Recently, information from completely sequenced genomes of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes has revealed the presence of genes that encode homologues of cation/Ca(2+) exchangers in many organisms in which the role of these exchangers has not been clearly demonstrated. In this study, we report a comprehensive sequence alignment and the first phylogenetic analysis of the cation/Ca(2+) exchanger superfamily of 147 sequences. The results present a framework for structure-function relationships of cation/Ca(2+) exchangers, suggesting unique signature motifs of conserved residues that may underlie divergent functional properties. Construction of a phylogenetic tree with inclusion of cation/Ca(2+) exchangers with known functional properties defines five protein families and the evolutionary relationships between the members. Based on this analysis, the cation/Ca(2+) exchanger superfamily is classified into the YRBG, CAX, NCX, and NCKX families and a newly recognized family, designated CCX. These findings will provide guides for future studies concerning structures, functions, and evolutionary origins of the cation/Ca(2+) exchangers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".