Cloning and Characterization of the Novel Thyroid and Eye Muscle Shared Protein G2s: Autoantibodies against G2s Are Closely Associated with Ophthalmopathy in Patients with Graves’ Hyperthyroidism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Serum autoantibodies against eye muscle antigens are closely linked with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO), although their significance is unclear. The two antigens that are most often recognized are eye muscle membrane proteins with molecular masses of 55 and 64 kDa, as determined from immunoblotting with crude human or porcine eye muscle membranes. We cloned a fragment of the 55-kDa protein by screening an eye muscle expression library with affinity-purified anti-55 kDa protein antibody prepared from a TAO patient's serum. A complementary DNA (cDNA) encoding a novel protein, which we have called G2s, was sequenced on both strands, and its size was 411 bp. The open reading frame of G2s corresponded to a 121-amino acid peptide with a size of 1.4 kb. Using the rapid amplification of 5'-cDNA ends technique we were able to clone an additional 0.3 kb of the protein. G2s did not share significant homologies with any other entered protein in computer databases and had one putative transmembrane domain. Using the 1.4 kb cDNA as probe in Northern blotting of a panel of messenger ribonucleic acids prepared from human tissues, the parent protein was shown to correspond to a large molecule of about 5.8 kb with a calculated molecular mass of approximately 220 kDa, consistent with earlier immunoblot studies performed in the absence of reducing agents. G2s was strongly expressed in eye muscle, thyroid, and other skeletal muscle and to a lesser extent in pancreas, liver, lung, and heart muscle, but not in kidney or orbital fibroblasts. We tested sera from patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism with and without ophthalmopathy and from control patients and subjects for antibodies against a G2s fusion protein by immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In immunoblotting, antibodies reactive with G2s were identified in 70% of patients with TAO of less than 3 yr duration, 53% with TAO of more than 3 yr duration, 36% with Graves' hyperthyroidism without evident ophthalmopathy, 17% with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, 3% with type 1 diabetes, 23% with nonimmunological thyroid disorders, and 16% of normal subjects. The prevalences, compared to normal values, were significant for the two groups of patients with TAO, but not for the other groups. Tests were positive in 54% of patients with active TAO, 33% with chronic ophthalmopathy, 36% with Graves' hyperthyroidism, 54% with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, 23% with type 1 diabetes, and in 11% of normal subjects using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The antibodies predicted the development of the ocular myopathy subtype of TAO in six of seven patients and the congestive ophthalmopathy subtype in seven of eight patients, respectively, with Graves' hyperthyroidism studied prospectively during and after antithyroid drug therapy. Antibodies reactive with G2s may be early markers of ophthalmopathy in patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism. Because G2s is expressed in both thyroid and eye muscle, immunoreactivity against a shared epitope in the two tissues may explain the well known link between thyroid autoimmunity and ophthalmopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".