Mehlich 3 extractable nutrients as determined by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly technique of soil analysis that is particularly advantageous in intensive soil sampling and soil nutrient management as well. This study evaluated the potential of NIRS for predicting P, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, and Al extracted by Mehlich 3. We used 150 air-dried samples collected from a 15-ha site dominated by Orthic Humic Gleysol and Gleyed Dystric Brunisol soils. Calibration equations were developed using modified partial least squares regression. The accuracy of NIRS prediction was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), the ratio of performance deviation (RPD), and the ratio of error range (RER). Reliable calibrations were found for Ca, Cu, and Mg (R2 ≥ 0.7, RPD ≥ 1.75, and RER ≥ 8). Less-reliable calibrations were found for Al, Fe, K, Mn, P, and Zn (R2 < 0.7, RPD < 1.75, and RER < 8). In the validation with independent samples, acceptable regression coefficients (i.e., 0.8 ≤ slope ≤ 1.2) were only found for Ca, Mg, and Mn. We presumed that the pH of the Mehlich 3 extractant (2.5 ± 0.1) may affect the solubility of most of these nutrients, regardless the soil texture and, consequently, the potential of NIRS to predict them. The more a nutrient was correlated to clay content, the more it was likely predictable by NIRS. The prediction models obtained for Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, and Mn could still be used for screening purposes in cases where high accuracy is not required. These NIRS prediction models should be validated across larger geographic areas of geological homogeneity. Key words: Soil analysis, Mehlich 3, near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy, calibration
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".