MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170055089 · doi:10.1109/nafips.2008.4531232

Supplier selection in a multi-item/multi-supplier environment

2008· article· en· W2170055089 on OpenAlexaff
Soheil Davari, M.H. Fazel Zarandi, İ.B. Türkşen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaguenessSelection (genetic algorithm)Computer scienceSimplicityDecision makerProcess (computing)Piecewise linear functionFuzzy logicFunction (biology)PiecewiseMathematical optimizationOperations researchArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suppliers play a pivotal role in success of any organization. Supplier Selection is a complicated problem due to the vagueness of data and also its multi-criteria nature and the real world still observes a noticeable gap between its theory and practice. The aim of this paper is to present a fuzzy decision-making approach to address this problem in a way that facilitates the process of decision making while not deteriorating its comprehensiveness. The main contributions of the paper are twofold: First, a model is developed to consider multiple suppliers and multiple items. Moreover, a Piecewise Linear Membership Function (PLMF) is proposed for a specific criterion and is shown how it leads to better solutions. The model functions well in cases where decision maker is sensitive about a specific criterion, in other words, when there are some unequal weights for objectives of the problem. Although asymmetric methods proposed by Zimmerman are a way to tackle the above-mentioned situations; it is demonstrated that how the proposed model brings about both efficiency and simplicity for decision maker which is originated from the utilization of PLMF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMulti-Criteria Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207