MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170067254 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2011.22077

Hospital Resource Use by Patients with Schizophrenia: Reduction after Conversion from Oral Treatment to Risperidone Long-Acting Injection

2011· article· en· W2170067254 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Koczerginski, Larry Arshoff

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsWilliam Osler Health System
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)RisperidoneMedicineHealth carePsychiatryIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chronic relapsing nature of schizophrenia is associated with significant resource use. The William Osler Health System, Brampton Civic Hospital site, in Brampton, Ontario, provides comprehensive in-patient and outpatient mental health services to the community it serves, including patients with schizophrenia. The clinical benefits observed in patients with schizophrenia treated through the injection clinic led the hospital to evaluate the costs, resource use and potential savings associated with injectable compared with oral therapy. The substantial savings accruing to the hospital and the healthcare system provide a strong economic rationale for injectable therapy as an alternative level of care for patients with schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207